Priority Selection Within National Innovation Strategy in Global Context

Olha Prokopenko; Vitaliy Omelyanenko

doi:10.1515/eb-2017-0014

Priority Selection Within National Innovation Strategy in Global Context

Authors

Olha Prokopenko University of Bielsko-Biala, Bielsko-Biala, Poland
Vitaliy Omelyanenko Sumy State University, Sumy, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1515/eb-2017-0014

Keywords:

Strategy, international cooperation, innovations, priorities, globalization

Abstract

The article deals with global experience in analysing the priorities based on their importance for country development and on national and international criteria using algorithm for the selection process. The main aspects of the process of development and implementation of international technology strategies were considered. The authors prove that through the analysis of innovation systems at macro level decision about the priorities in optimization with the aim to improve regulations in science, technology and innovation is provided. The main techniques and decisions were considered based on foresight-studies. Authors propose to create informative and analytical system for the foresight aims.

References

Atkinson, R. D., Ezell, S. J., & Stewart, L. A. (2012). The Global Innovation Policy Index, Washington, DC: Information Technology and Innovation Foundation and the Kauffman Foundation.

Buckles, D. (2013). Innovations with Evaluation Methods: Lessons from a Community of Practice in International Development. Publié par Canada World Youth, Montreal, Canada.

Ely, A. (2012). Harnessing diversity across the global innovation system: a key challenge post Rio+20, STEPS Centre.

Ginzburg, V. E., & Kibalnikov, S. V. (2011). Overview of technological problems of a sustainable development of the human civilization from a position of perveance e-optics. Sustainable innovation development: design and management, 4(13), 38-52. Retrieved from http://www.rypravlenie.ru/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/3-Kibalnikov.pdf (in Russian)

Gretchenko, A. A. (2010). Foresight as an innovative instrument forecasting and implementation of scientific and technological priorities. Bulletin of the Siberian State Aerospace University. M.F. Reshetnev, 1, 154-159.

Gumerova, G., Shaimieva, E. & Kazimov, A. (2009). Open innovation and open technology platforms. Investments into Russia, 3, 42-48.

Havas, A., Schartinger, D., & Weber, M. (2010). The impact of foresight on innovation policymaking: recent experiences and future perspectives. Research Evaluation, 19(2), 91-104. https://doi.org/10.3152/095820210X510133

King, K. S. (2013). Strategic innovation priorities for sustainable manufacturing in Australia. Proceedings of the 11th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing - Innovative Solutions, Universitätsverlag der TU Berlin.

Krapyvny, I. V., Omelyanenko, V. A., & Vernydub, N. O. (2015). International innovation networks as new stage of innovation development, Economic Processes Management: International Scientific E-Journal, 1. Retrieved from http://epm.fem.sumdu.edu.ua/download/2015_1/2015_1_17.pdf

Lesslie, R. (2012). Mapping our priorities - innovation in spatial decision support. In P. Figgis, J. Fitzsimon & J. Irving (Eds). Innovation for 21st Century Conservation (pp. 156-163). Australian Committee for IUCN Inc.

Linden, G., Kraemer, K., & Dedrick, J. (2007). Who Captures Value in a Global Innovation System? The Case of Apple’s iPod, Personal Computing Industry Center, University of California, Irvine.

OECD. (2005). Public Sector Modernisation: Open Government Policy Brief.

Ohler, F., Radauer, A., Vermeulen, N., Ionita, M., Rotaru, F., Țoncu, A. C., Pislaru, D., & Horvat, M. (2012). Mid-Term Evaluation of the National Strategy and of the National RD&I Plan 2007-13. Retrieved from http://www.research.gov.ro/uploads/organizare/mid_termevaluation/mte_national_strategy_plan_final_report_2012_01_23.pdf

Omelyanenko, V. A. (2015). Space technologies transfer as an economic growth driver. Economic Processes Management: International Scientific E-Journal, 2. Retrieved from http://epm.fem.sumdu.edu.ua/download/2015_2/2015_2_20.pdf

Omelyanenko, V. A. (2016a). General context of economic and legal reforms international comparative studies (example of innovation development). Economic Processes Management: International Scientific E-Journal, 3. Retrieved from http://epm.fem.sumdu.edu.ua/download/2016_3/epm2016_3_8.pdf

Omelyanenko, V. A. (2016b). Innovation priorities optimization in the context of national technological security ensuring. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 4, 226-234.

Prokopenko, O., Eremenko, Y., & Omelyanenko, V. (2014). Role of international factor in innovation ecosystem formation. Economic Annals-XXI, 3-4 (2), 4-7.

Prokopenko, О., & Omelyanenko, V. (2014). Analysis of characteristics of technology marketing in high-tech industry (case of space industry). The contemporary problems of management - valuebased marketing, social responsibility and other factors in process of development - micro, meso and macro aspect. Bielsko-Biala: University of Bielsko-Biala.

Sörvik. J., & Kleibrink, A. (2015). Mapping Innovation Priorities and Specialisation Patterns in Europe. S3 Working Paper Series No 08/2015, European Commission, Joint Research Centre.

Stenberg, L., & Nagano, H. (2009). Priority-Setting in Japanese Research and Innovation Policy. VINNOVA Analysis.

Wyckoff, A., & Colecchia, A. (1999). The Economic and Social Impact of Electronic Commerce. OECD.