The Impact of Knowledge Generating Investment on GDP Growth
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7250/eb.2014.014Keywords:
Education, GDP growth rate, intangible assets, Research and Development (R&D).Abstract
The article analyzes the impact of knowledge generating investments on the economic growth. It was found that the main investment cash flows are intangible, education, research and development costs. Since in Lithuania the core capital is mainly formed from tangible assets and intangible assets constitute only a small part of an emerging capital, the largest part of investment goes to education, research and development, while the smallest one – to intangible assets. The research is intended to support the impact of knowledge generating investments impact on GDP growth, interconnection and level of significance.References
Bagdanavičius, J., “Žmogiškasis kapitalas,” Technologija: Vilnius, 2002.
Blankas, I. A., “Investicijų valdymas,” Kijevas: Nikos centras. Elga, 2002.
Cekanavicius, L. and Kasnauskiene, G., “Too High or Just Right? Cost-Benefit Approach to Emigration Question,” Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics (1), 2009, pp. 28–36.
Chow, C., Deng, F. and Ho, J., “The openness of knowledge sharing within organizations: a comparative study of the United States and the People’s Republic of China,” Journal of Management Accounting Research, vol. 12, no. 1, 2000, pp. 65–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/jmar.2000.12.1.65
Corrado, C. A. and Hulten, C. R., “How do you measure a “Technological Revolution”?” Available: http://www.conference-board.org/pdf_free/AEA2010.pdf, 2010.
“European Round table,” Available: http://www.ert.eu.
Daugėlienė, R., “Transformation of the Economy: the expression of knowledge – based economy penetration and the Assesment models,” Wissensbasierte okonomie im zeitalter des internet. Technische Universitata Koszalin, Kompetenzzentrum EU – Osterwiterubg am BiG Greifswald, 2005.
Daugėlienė, R and Kriščiūnas, K., “Pecularities of knowledge-based economy assesment: theoretical approach,” Juxtaposition of European Union Enlargement and Lisbon Processes. Kaunas: Technologija, 2004.
Daugėlienė, R. and Volodzkiene, L., “The Assesment peculiarities of human resource impact to the knowledge economy’s development,” Enlarged European Union in house of Europe: new internal and external problems, 2010.
INTAN-Invest. Available: http://www.intan-invest.net.
Karazijienė, Ž. and. Sabonienė, A., “Žinių visuomenės formavimas žinių ekonomikos kontekste,” Ekonomika ir vadyba, no. 15, 2010, pp. 566–573.
Krikščiūnas, K and Daugėlienė, R., “Žiniomis grįstos ekonomikos link: žinių raiška ir skvarba,” Technologija: Vilnius, 2006.
Hicks, R. C., Dattero, R. D. & Galup, S. D., “A metaphor for knowledge management: explicit islands in a tacit sea,” Journal of Knowledge Management, vol. 11, no. 1, 2007, pp. 5–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13673270710728204
Liepė, Z and Sakalas, A., “The three-loop learning model appliance in new product development,” Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, no. 3, 2008, pp. 73–80.
Li, Y. H., Huang, J. W. & Tsai, M. T., “Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The role of knowledge creation process,” Industrial Marketing Management, vol. 38, 2009, pp. 440–449. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.02.004
Lee, L. T. and Sukoco, B. M., “The effects of entrepreneurial orientation and knowledge management capability on organizational and knowledge effectiveness in Taiwan: The moderating role of Social Capital,” International Journal of Management, vol. 24, no. 3, 2007 pp. 549–572.
Lithuanian Department of Statistics. Available: http://www. stat.gov.lt/
Makstutis, A., “The problems of development of national state,” Journal of Business Economics and Management, vol. 8, no. 1, 2007, pp. 63–68.
Mačerinskienė, I and Survilaitė, S., “Intellectual capital as the main factor of company‘s value added,” Intelektinė ekonomika, vol. 5, no. 4(12), 2011, pp. 560–574.
Nonaka, I., “A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation,” Organization Science, 5(1), 1994, pp. 14–37.
Nonaka, I, Toyama, R. and Nagata, A., “A firm as a knowledge-creating entify: A new perspective on the theory of the firm,” Industrial and Corporate Change, vol. 9, no. 1, 2000, pp. 1–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icc/9.1.1
Pranulis, V. P., “Marketing studies and science in Lithuania,” Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, (1), 2008, pp. 22–28.
Paris forum “Usage of knowledge European Union‘s associated countries development,” Available: www.verslobanga.lt/lt/zb.dow nload/... /Butkaus_pranesimas.ppt
Snitka, V., “Mokslinių tyrimų, technologijų, inovacijų politika ir žinių ekonomikos plėtra,” Kaunas. Available: http://www.microsys.ktu.Lt/ Snitka_prezentacijos/PDF/Snitka%20Moksliniu%20tyrimu_technologiju_Inovaciju%20politika_ziniu%20ekonomika%201.pdf, 2002.
Strazdas, R., Jakubavičius, A., Gečas, K. Inovacijos (finansavimas rizikos kapitalas). Vilnius: Lietuvos inovacijų centras. Available: http://www. inovacijos.lt/ inopagalba/cms/65lt.pdf, 2003.
Sakalas, A. and Venskus, R., “Interaction of Learning Organization and Organizational structure,” Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics (3), 2007.
Sajeva, S. and Jucevicius, R., “Determination of Essential Knowledge Management System Components and their Parameters,” Social Sciences, 1 (67), 2010, pp. 80–91.
Teece, D. J., “Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets,” California Management Review, 40 (3), 1998, pp. 55–79.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 Rita Bužinskienė, Dalia Rudytė (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
