Development of State-Owned Enterprises of Transport Industry in Latvia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1515/eb-2016-0023Keywords:
Business, competitiveness, entrepreneurship, state-owned enterprises, transport industryAbstract
The transport infrastructure and state-owned enterprises (SOEs) have a significant effect on competitiveness of transport industry, and indirectly determine the business environment in related sectors. In Latvia, all transport related state strategies and policies are developed, controlled and overviewed by the Ministry of Transport. Eleven companies are engaged in commercial/non-commercial activities, and evaluated whether the liberalization of certain activities would provide efficiency among SOEs in the transport industry of Latvia, given the sectoral weight and share of State involvement and control of the industry. There is limited and contradictory debate to what extent the Latvian state should involve in business activities of transport industry, and how to balance the multiple interests and targets of business, society and politics. The present research is based on the scientific papers, official documents of the World Bank and OECD (Organisation of Economic Cooperation and Development), company websites and annual reports.References
Aharoni, Y. (1981). Performance evaluation of state-owned enterprises: A process perspective. Management Science , 27 (11), 1340–1347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.27.11.1340
Aharoni, Y. (2000.) The performance of state-owned enterprises. In P. A. Toninelli (Ed.), The rise and fall of state-owned enterprise in the Western world (pp. 49–72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511896798.004
Alison, C. & Kohler, P. (2005). Property law: commentary and materials . Cambridge University Press. p. 40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139051941.003
Baltic Institute of Corporate Governance. (2012) Governance of State owned enterprises in Baltic States . Retrieved Sept. 25, 2015, from http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/a69fbc00446b373cb109bdc66d9c728b/Kristian+Kaas+Mortensen.pdf?MOD=AJPERES
Basu, K. (2008). China and India and world recession. BBC News . Retrieved Sept. 15, 2015, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7733797.stm
Boycko, M. Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. W. (1996). A Theory of Privatization. Economic Journal , 106 (435), 309–319. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2235248
Boycko, M., Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. (1997). Privatizing Russia . Cambridge: MIT Press.
Bortolotti, B. & Faccio, M. (2009). Government control of privatized firms. Review of Financial Studies , 22 (8), 2907–2939. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn077
Carnegie, G. & West, B. (2005). Making accounting accountable in the public sector. Critical Perspectives on Accounting , 16 (7), 905–928. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2004.01.002
Calderon, C. & Serven, L. (2003). The Output Cost of Latin America’s Infrastructure Gap. In Easterly, W. & Servén, L. (Ed.), The Limits of Stabilization: Infrastructure, Public Deficits, and Growth in Latin America. (pp. 95–118). Stanford University Press and the World Bank.
Caves, D. W. & Christensen, L. R. (1980). The Relative Efficiency of Public and Private Firms in Competitive Environment: The Case of Canadian Railroads. Journal of Political Economy , 88 (5), 958–976. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/260916
Christiansen, H. (2011). The Size and Composition of the SOE Sector in OECD Countries. OECD Corporate Governance Working Papers, No. 5, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5kg54cwps0s3-en
Cuervo-Cazurra, A. & Dau, L. A. (2009). Pro market reforms and firm profitability in developing countries. Academy of Management Journal , 52 (6), 1348–1368. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.47085192
Cross-Sectoral Coordination Centre. (n.d.). Retrieved May 1, 2016, from www.pkc.gov.lv
D’Souza, J. & Megginson, W. (1999), The Financial and Operating Performance of Privatized Firms During the 1990s. Journal of Finance, 54 (4), 1397–1438. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00150
Dewenter, K. L. & Malatesta, P. H. (2001). State-Owned and privately Owned Firms: An Empirical Analysis of Profitability, Leverage, and Labor Intensity. The American Economic Review , 91 (1), 320–334. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.1.320
EBRD. (2013). Transport sector strategy document of the European bank for reconstruction and development .
Economist. (2012, Jan. 21). Special report: State capitalism, 1–18.
Estache, A. (2006). Infrastructure: A survey of recent and upcoming issues. The World Bank, Mimeo, April 2006. (version 2.0).
Flynn, N. (2002). Explaining new public management: The importance of context. In McLaughlin K., Osborne, S. & Ferlie, E. (Eds.), New public management: Current trends and future prospects (pp. 57–76). London: Routledge.
Graham, A. (1997). The UK 1979–95: Myths and Realities of Conservative Capitalism . In Crouch, C. & Streeck, W. (Eds.), Political Economy of Modern Capitalism, London: Sage, 117–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446217849.n7
Grout, P. A. & Martin, S. (2003). The Assessment: Financing and Managing Public Services. Oxford Review of Economic Policy , 19 (2), 215–234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/19.2.215
Horizon 2020 – Work Programme (2014–2015). (n.d.). Smart, green and integrated transport, pp. 57. Retrieved Sept. 30, 2015, from http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/smart-green-and-integrated-transport
Hou, W. & Moore, G. (2011). Player and referee roles held jointly: The effect of state ownership on China’s regulatory enforcement against fraud. Journal of Business Ethics , 95 , 317–335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0858-1
IMF Country Report. (2015). No. 15/110, Republic of Latvia Article IV Consultation––staff report; informational annex and press release.
Karnitis E. & Virtmanis, A. (2011). Multi-sectoral regulation of services of general economic interest – Ten year experience of Latvia . Public Utilities Commission of Latvia: Riga.
Kole, S. R. & Mulherin H. J. (1997). The Government as a Shareholder: A case from the United States. The Journal of Law and Economics , 40 (1), 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/467364
Kowalski, P., Buge, M., Sztajerowska, M. & Egeland, M. (2013). State-Owned Enterprises: Trade Effects and Policy Implications. OECD Trade Policy Papers , No. 147, OECD Publishing, 35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k4869ckqk7l-en
Kronbergs & Cukste. (2012). Advokata biroja 4. nodevums Valsts kancelejas konkursa “Publiskās personas dalības kapitālsabiedrībā mērķa, nepieciešamības un statusa kritēriju izvērtējums” Starpziņojums par valsts dalības kapitālsabiedrībās analīzi, Riga, 142–143.
Lane, J. E. (2000). New public management . London: Routledge.
Lawson, C. (1994). The theory of state-owned enterprises in market economies. Journal of Economic Surveys , 8 (3), 283–309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.1994.tb00104.x
Levy, B. (1987). A theory of public enterprise behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization , 8 (1), 75–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(87)90022-9
Lindsay, C. M. (1976). A theory of government enterprise. Journal of Political Economy , 84 (5), 1061–1077. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/260496
Lin, L.-W. & Milhaupt, C. J. (2011). We are the (national) champions: Understanding the mechanisms of state capitalism in China. Columbia Law and Economics Working paper , New York: Columbia University School of Law. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1952623
Ministry of Economy (2014). Economic Development of Latvia Report, June 2014, p. 29.
Ministry of Economy (2013). Economic Development of Latvia Report, June 2013, p. 28.
Megginson, M. & Netter, J. (2001). From State to Market: A Survey of Empirical Studies on Privatization. Journal of Economic Literature , 39 (2), 321–389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jel.39.2.321
Morris, M. H. & Kuratko, D. F. (2002). Corporate Entrepreneurship , Fort Worth: Harcourt College Publishers.
Mortensen, K. K. (2009). Annual review of State owned assets . Baltic Institute of Corporate Governance.
Munnell, A. H. (1990a). Why has productivity growth declined? Productivity and public investment. New England Economic Review , January/February, 3–22. Retrieved Sept. 15, 2015, from http://www.bostonfed.org/economic/neer/neer1990/neer190a.pdf
Munnell, A. H., (1990b). How does public infrastructure affect regional economic performance? New England Economic Review , September/October, 11–32. Retrieved Sept. 15, 2015, from https://www.bostonfed.org/economic/neer/neer1990/neer590b.pdf
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance . New York: Norton. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511808678
OECD. (2005). Guidelines of the Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises.
OECD. (2005). OECD, Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises: A Survey of OECD Countries Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development . Paris.
OECD. (2003). R eport on Non-Commercial Service Obligations and Liberalisation .
OECD. (2015). Review of the Corporate Governance of State-Owned Enterprises Latvia.
OECD. (2010). State-Owned Enterprises and the Principle of Competitive Neutrality . OECD Publishing, 26–27.
OECD. (2014). The size and Sectoral Distribution of SOEs in OECD and Partner Countries . OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2008). Transport Infrastructure Investment: Options for Efficiency. OECD Publishing, p. 36.
Okhmatovskiy, I. (2010). Performance implications of ties to the government and SOEs: A political embeddedness perspective. Journal of Management Studies , 47 (6), 1020–1047. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00881.x
Osborne, D. & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing government: How the entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector . Addison-Wesley, Reading.
Perotti, E. (1995). Credible Privatization. American Economic Review , 85 (4), 847–859.
Pryke, R. (1982). The Comparative Performance of Public and Private Enterprise. Fiscal Studies , 3 (2), 68–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5890.1982.tb00572.x
Puffer, S. M., & McCarthy, D. J. (2007). Can Russia’s state-managed, network capitalism be competitive? Institutional pull versus institutional push. Journal of World Business , 42 (1), 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2006.08.008
Sahoo, P. & Dash, R. K. (2008). Economic Growth in South Asia: Role of Infrastructure with . Institute of Economic Growth Working paper, No. 288.
Sahoo, P. & Dash, R. K. (2009). Infrastructure Development and Economic Growth in India, Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy , 14 (4), 351–365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13547860903169340
Savas, E. (1981). Alternative Institutional Models for the delivery of public services. Public Budgeting and Finance , Winter, 12–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5850.00533
Sheshinski, E. & López-Calva, L. F. (2003). Privatization and its Benefits: Theory and Evidence. CESifo Economic Studies , 49 (3), 429–459. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/49.3.429
Shirley, M. M. & Walsh, P. (2000). Public versus Private Ownership: The Current State of the Debate . Policy Research Working Papers, World Bank, Washington. http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-2420
Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A Survey of Corporate Governance. Journal of Finance , 52 (2), 737–783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
Shirley, M. (1991). Evaluating the Performance of State-Owned Enterprises in Pakistan. In Ramamurti, R. & Vernon, R. (Eds.), Privatization and Control of State-Owned Enterprises, (pp. 234–278). Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, EDI Development Studies.
Shirley, M. (1999). Bureaucrats in Business: The Role of Privatization versus Corporatization in State-Owned Enterprise Reform. World Development , 27 (1), 115–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00130-2
Shleifer, A. & Vishny, R. W. (1994). Politicians and firms. Quarterly Journal of Economic , 109 (4), 995–1025. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2118354
Shleifer, A. (1998). State versus Private Ownership. Journal of Economic Perspectives , 12 (4), 133–150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.12.4.133
Short, R. P., (1984). The role of public enterprises: An International Statistical Comparison. In Floyd, R. H., Gray, C. S. & Short, R. P. (Eds.), Public Enterprises in Mixed Economies: Some Macroeconomic Aspects, (pp. 110–181). Washington D.C.: IMF.
Stiglitz, J. E. (1988). Economics of the Public Sector , (2nd ed.). London: Norton & Company.
Talbot, C. (2001). UK Public Services and Management (1979–2000): Evolution or Revolution? International Journal of Public Sector Management , 14 (4), 281–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513550110396318
Tan, J. (2002). Culture, nation, and entrepreneurial strategic orientations: implications for an emerging economy. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice , 26 (4), 95–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1552182
Toninelli, P. A. (2000). The Rise and Fall of Public Enterprise: The Framework. In Toninelli, P. A. (Ed.), The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprise in the western World, (pp. 3–24). Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511896798.002
Vickers, J. (1995). Concepts of Competition. Oxford Economic Papers , 47 (1), 1–23. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2663661
Vickers, J. & Yarrow, G. (1988). Privatization: An Economic Analysis . Cambridge: MIT Press.
Vickers, J. & Yarrow, G. (1989). Privatization: An Economic Analysis . Cambridge: MIT Press.
Walsh, K. (1995). Public Services and Market Mechanisms: Competition, Contracting and the New Public Management. London: Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23979-5
Wengenroth, U. (2000). The rise and fall of state-owned enterprise in Germany. In Toninelli, P. M. (Ed.). The Rise and Fall of State-Owned Enterprise in the Western World , (pp. 103–127). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511896798.006
World Bank. (1995). Bureaucrats in Business : The Economics and Politics of Government Ownership .
World Bank. (1994). W orld Development Report 1994: Infrastructure for development . New York: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1596/978-0-1952-0992-1
World Bank. (2013). Review of port sector of Latvia: Competitiveness and governance Final report.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Māris Plūmiņš, Deniss Ščeulovs (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.