Project Risk Register Analysis Based on the Theoretical Analysis of Project Management Notion of Risk

Authors

  • Juris Uzulāns University of Latvia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1515/eb-2016-0020

Keywords:

Definition analysis, project, risk, risk register

Abstract

The aim of the current research is to examine publicly available project risk registers to find correlations between the project management theory, especially project risk management, and practical results of real project risk management – the risk registers publicly available on the Internet. In the research, the author has analysed the compliance between the theories of the project risk management described in the “Aid Delivery Methods. Volume I. Project Cycle Management Guidelines” and “Caltrans Project Risk Management Handbook, Threats and Opportunities, Second Edition, Revision 0” and the project risk registers. In the previous studies, the author concluded that after analysing just 30 risk registers significant differences could be found between the risk register described in the theory and risk registers of real projects. The results of the theoretical analysis of the notion “risk” provide information for deeper analysis of the risk registers publicly available on the Internet.

References

Bodea, C. N. & Dascalu, M. I. (2009). Modelling Research Project Risks with Fuzzy Maps. Bucharest. Journal of Applied Quantitative methods, 4 (1), 17–30.

Chapman, R. J. (2006). Simple Tools and Techniques for Enterprise Risk Management . England, John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Dunović, I. B., Radujković, M. & Vukomanović, M. (2013). Risk register development and implementation for construction projects. Zagreb, Croatia: Journal of the Croatian Association of Civil Engineers , GRAĐEVINAR. 65, 23–35.

European Commission, Europe Aid Cooperation Office. (2004). Aid Delivery Methods . Volume I, Project Cycle Management Guidelines. Brussels: Europe Aid Cooperation Office, Development AG.

Hillson, D. (2009). Managing Risk in Projects . United Kingdom: Taylor & Francis Ltd.

Larson, E. W. & Gray, C. F. (2011). Project management. The Managerial Process (5th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Luppino, R., Hosseini, M. R. & Rameezdeen, R. (2014). Risk Management in Research and Development (R&D) Projects: The Case of South Australia. Asian Academy of Management Journal , 19 (2), 67–85.

Office of Statewide Project Management Improvement (OSPMI). (2007). Caltrans Project Risk Management Handbook, Threats and Opportunities (2nd ed.). Revision 0. Sacramento, CA: Office of Statewide Project Management Improvement (OSPMI).

Project Management Institute. (2013). A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge. (PMBOK® Guide ) (5th ed.). Newton Square, Pensilvania: Project Management Institute.

Uzulāns, J. (2013). Project Risk Management Documentation Maturity Model . Riga, Latvia: Second International Scientific Conference on Project Management in the Baltic Countries “Project Management Development – Practice and Perspectives”: Riga, Latvia, April 11–12, 2013. Conference Proceedings. Riga: University of Latvia, 253–257.

Uzulāns, J. (2014). Project Risk Management Documentation Evaluation Methods . Riga, Latvia: Third International Scientific Conference on Project Management in the Baltic Countries “Project Management Development – Practice and Perspectives”: Riga, Latvia, April 10–11, 2014. Conference Proceedings. Riga: University of Latvia, 291–299.

Uzulāns J. (2015). Project Risk Register Analysis And Practical Conclusions . Riga, Latvia: Fourth International Scientific Conference on Project Management in the Baltic Countries “Project Management Development – Practice and Perspectives”: Riga, Latvia, April 16–17, 2015. Conference Proceedings. Riga: University of Latvia, 414–421.

Downloads

Published

01.08.2016

How to Cite

Uzulāns, J. (2016). Project Risk Register Analysis Based on the Theoretical Analysis of Project Management Notion of Risk. Economics and Business, 29(1), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.1515/eb-2016-0020