Fiscal Strategies for Sustainable Transition: Addressing Revenue Challenges and Infrastructure Investment

Authors

  • Irina Ņesterenko Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia
  • Arina Judajeva-Iljina Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia
  • Māris Jurušs Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4022-5031

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7250/eb-2024-0008

Keywords:

Fiscal challenges, Electric vehicles, Traditional fuel taxes, Electricity use taxes, Lost revenues, Sustainable transportation system

Abstract

This research examines the fiscal challenges and potential solutions associated with the global transition to electric vehicles. Electric vehicle adoption is accelerating, and governments need more revenues from traditional fuel taxes while simultaneously needing to invest in charging infrastructure. The research examines possible tax strategies to reduce the budget deficit and provide long-term finance for transportation projects. It also emphasizes the importance of considering both tax policies’ short- and long-term impact on electric vehicle deployment and environmental goals. The research shows that phasing in taxes on electric vehicles, such as road tolls, mileage fees, battery production taxes, and electricity use taxes, can effectively offset lost revenues from fuel taxes. By proactively implementing such policies, governments may help smooth the transition to electric vehicles, ensure financial stability, and create a cleaner, more sustainable transportation system.

Supporting Agencies
This research was funded by the Latvian Science Council’s fundamental and applied research programme, project “Development of Model for Implementation of Sustainable and Environmentally Friendly Last Mile Distribution Transportation Services in Latvia” (TRANS4ECO), project No. lzp-2022/1-0306, 01.01.2023.- 31.12.2025.

References

Asgarian, F., Hejazi, S. R., & Khosroshahi, H. (2023). Investigating the impact of government policies to develop sustainable transportation and promote electric cars, considering fossil fuel subsidies elimination: A case of Norway. Applied Energy, 347, 121434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121434

Benrath, B. (2023). Switzerland Will Tax Electric Vehicles Like All Other Cars – Bloomberg. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-11-08/switzerland-will-tax-electric-vehicles-like-all-other-cars

Brizga, J., Jurušs, M., & Šmite-Roķe, B. (2022). Impact of the environmental taxes on reduction of emission from transport in Latvia. Post-Communist Economies, 34(5), 666–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2021.1965358

Carson, E. (2023). Electric Vehicle Subsidies: Germany Just Ended EV Subsidies. This is Tesla’s Response. | Investor’s Business Daily. https://www.investors.com/news/electric-vehicle-subsidies-germany-ends-ev-bonus-abruptly-in-latest-blow-to-tesla/

Chang, S., & Woo, J. (2024). Are electric vehicle users willing to pay tax for charging electric vehicles? A case study of South Korea. Energy Economics, 129, 107243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2023.107243

Deutch, J. (2017). Decoupling economic growth and carbon emissions. Joule, 1(1), 3–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.011

Eurostat. (2024). Environmental tax revenues. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/env_ac_tax/default/table?lang=en&category=env.env_eta

Hensher, D. A., Wei, E., & Liu, W. (2021). Battery electric vehicles in cities: Measurement of some impacts on traffic and government revenue recovery. Journal of Transport Geography, 94, 103121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103121

IEA. (2024). Global EV Outlook 2024 – Analysis – IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2024
Liu, Y., Zhao, X., Lu, D., & Li, X. (2023). Impact of policy incentives on the adoption of electric vehicle in China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 176, 103801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103801

Maciuk, K., Santos, C. a. G., Kulesza, L., Gawlik, A., Orzel, A., Jakubiak, M., Bajdor, P., Pytel, S., Specht, M., Krzykowska-Piotrowska, K., Nistor, S., Wengel, Y., & Apollo, M. (2024). An analysis of engine type trends in passenger cars: Are we ready for a green deal? Transport and Telecommunication Journal, 25(2), 113–135. https://doi.org/10.2478/ttj-2024-0009

Noll, B., Schmidt, T. S., & Egli, F. (2024). Managing trade-offs between electric vehicle taxation and adoption. Cell Reports Sustainability, 1(7), 100130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsus.2024.100130

Qadir, S. A., Ahmad, F., Al-Wahedi, A. M. A. B., Iqbal, A., & Ali, A. (2024). Navigating the complex realities of electric vehicle adoption: A comprehensive study of government strategies, policies, and incentives. Energy Strategy Reviews, 53, 101379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2024.101379

Ramachandaramurthy, V. K., Ajmal, A. M., Kasinathan, P., Tan, K. M., Yong, J. Y., & Vinoth, R. (2023). Social Acceptance and Preference of EV Users—A Review. IEEE Access, 11, 11956–11972. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2023.3241636

Shuai, C., Chen, X., Wu, Y., Zhang, Y., & Tan, Y. (2018). A three-step strategy for decoupling economic growth from carbon emission: Empirical evidences from 133 countries. The Science of the Total Environment, 646, 524–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.045

Wu, Y., Zhu, Q., & Zhu, B. (2018). Decoupling analysis of world economic growth and CO2 emissions: A study comparing developed and developing countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.139

Downloads

Published

17.12.2024

How to Cite

Ņesterenko, I., Judajeva-Iljina, A., & Jurušs, M. (2024). Fiscal Strategies for Sustainable Transition: Addressing Revenue Challenges and Infrastructure Investment. Economics and Business, 38, 121-130. https://doi.org/10.7250/eb-2024-0008