Assessment of Impact of Corporate Income Tax Suspension on Financial Performance of Businesses

Authors

  • Valentīna Bizņa Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia
  • Māris Jurušs Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia
  • Tālis Laizāns Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia
  • Roberts Šnikvalds Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.2478/eb-2018-0014

Keywords:

profit, corporate income tax, equity, financial performance, economic development

Abstract

Though there are a number of data and studies about the impact of tax incentives on investment, research and development, no detailed and systematic analysis has been elaborated on the effectiveness of taxation of profit to the financial performance of businesses in general. Businesses avoid corporate income tax to get more net profit. Evasion leads to economic stagnation. It is time to call for changes of the corporate income tax system and introduce tax suspension - tax only shared profit. The aim of the research is to assess the impact of corporate income tax suspension on retained corporate income. The research extends applicable theoretical foundation and comprehension of elements and factors affecting firms’ behaviour. The results show that the corporate income tax reform would change capital structure of businesses and improve company’s sustainability. The findings also give grounds for the development of an applicable model that would help government authorities choose the most effective way of taxation of corporate income.

References

Amadeus. (2016). A Database Containing Financial Information on Approximately 8 Million Public and Private Companies in 38 European Countries. Retrieved from https://www.bvdinfo.com/en-us/our-products/company-information/international-products/amadeus

Badertscher, B., Katz, S. P., & Rego, S. O. (2009). The Impact of Private Equity Ownership on Corporate Tax Avoidance. Harvard Business School Working Papers 10-004. Retrieved from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/hbs/wpaper/10-004.html

Devereux, M. P., Griffith, R., & Klemm, A. (2002). Corporate Income Tax Reforms and International Tax Competition. Economic policy, 17(35), 449-495. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0327.00094

Domnīca Certus. (2016). Competitiveness of Latvia. Report about Taxation. Retrieved from http://certusdomnica.lv/

Eurostat. (2016). Foreign Direct Investments in % of GDP. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostar

Gorter, J., & Mooij, R. A. (2001). Capital Income Taxation in Europe: Trends and Trend-offs. Retrieved from:https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ruud_Mooij/publication/4748914_Capital_Income_Taxation_in_Europe_Trends_and_Trade-offs/links/00b4952323a5b54055000000.pdf

Graetz, M. J., & Warren Jr., A. C. (2016). Integration of Corporate and Shareholder Taxes. National Tax Journal, 69(3), 677-700. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2016.3.07

Gruevski, I., & Gaber, S. (2015). Classical Corporation Tax System: the Classical Model of Pure “Double” Taxation of Company’s Income. Economic Development, 17(3), 241-254.

Guziejewska, B., Grabowski, W., & Bryndziak, S. (2014). Tax Competition Strategies in Corporate Income Tax - the Case of EU Countries. Business & Economic Horizons, 10(4), 253-271. https://doi.org/10.15208/beh.2014.21

Hazak, A. (2007). Companies’ Financial Decisions under the Distributed Profit Taxation Regime of Estonia. Working Papers in Economics, TUTWPE No 155, 5-19. Retrieved from: http://deepthought.ttu.ee/majandus/tekstid/TUTWPE_07_155.pdf

Hazak, A. (2009). Companies’ Financial Decision under the Distributed Profit Taxation Regime of Estonia. Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 45(4), 4-12. https://doi.org/10.2753/REE1540-496X450401 .

Jurušs, M., Stinka, J., & Kūma, E. (2017, May). Shifting from Taxation of Corporate Income to Distributed Profit: The Concept for Latvia. XVIII Turiba University Conference Communication in the Global Village: Interests and Influence. 88-95.pp. Retrieved from: http://www.turiba.lv/f/Conference_XVIII_Turiba_18.05.2017.FINAL.pdf

Masso, J., Meriküll, J., Vahter, P. (2011). Gross Profit Taxation Versus Distributed Profit Taxation and Firm Performance: Effects of Estonia’s Corporate Income Tax Reform. University of Tartu: Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series, No. 81, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1793143

Masso, J., Meriküll, J., & Vahter, P. (2013). Shift from Gross Profit Taxation to Distributed Profit Taxation: Are There Effects on Firms? Journal of Comparative Economics, 41, 1092-1105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2013.01.011

Ministry of Economics (2016). Report on the Latvian economy. Retrieved November 7, 2016, from https://www.em.gov.lv/files/tautsaimniecibas_attistiba/2016_jun.pdf.

Nasyrov, N., & Shtyrlyaeva, V. (2015). The Need to Cancel the Double Taxation of Dividends. Finance & Credit, 21(17), 46-52.

Prohorovs, A., Fainglozs, L., & Jonina, V. (2016). Introduction of the Deferral of corporate Income Tax before the Distribution of Company Profits as an Essential Factor for the Development of the Latvian Economy. RISEBA Working Paper 16/9. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2939173

Downloads

Published

01.02.2018

How to Cite

Bizņa, V., Jurušs, M., Laizāns, T., & Šnikvalds, R. (2018). Assessment of Impact of Corporate Income Tax Suspension on Financial Performance of Businesses. Economics and Business, 32, 172-181. https://doi.org/10.2478/eb-2018-0014