Ontological Analysis of the Project Risk Management Concept ‘Risk’

Authors

  • Juris Uzulāns University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1515/eb-2018-0002

Keywords:

concept, event, ontological analysis, project, project risk register, risk

Abstract

The aim of the current research series is to examine the definitions of the concept ‘risk’ and analyze the concepts used in the definitions of ‘risk’ in the sources of these definitions in order to perform the ontological analysis of the concept of ‘risk’. Ontological and epistemological analysis of the concepts in the definition of the concept ‘risk’ was used to answer the question what ‘risk’ means in project management. This investigation represents a part of the research series where the ontological, epistemological and methodological analysis of project risk is performed with the aim to improve risk registers and risk management as a whole. In the previous studies the author analyzed the concept of ‘event’ that defines the content of the concept ‘risk’. The use of ‘event’ was analyzed in different sources to find out how the concept should be used. The ontological, epistemological and methodological analysis of the definitions of the concept ‘risk’ is the theoretical foundation for risk register creation because it is possible to create complete and understandable register for the participants of the project risk management process. The author believes that the conducted research helps establish confidence that ontological analysis is the method that together with the epistemological and methodological analysis provides opportunity to perform analysis of risk management sources aimed at improving risk management. The results of the study cannot be considered sufficient for deriving valid conclusions about project risk management and developing recommendations for improving risk management with regard to the content of the risk register. For valid conclusions and recommendations, a deeper research is needed which, first of all, would analyze a larger number of sources.

References

Association for Project Management. (2006). APM Body of Knowledge (5th ed.). Buckinghamshire: Association for Project Management.

Chapman, C., & Ward, S. (2003). Project Risk Management. Processes, Techniques and Insights (2nd ed.). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Cooper, D., Grey, S., Raymond, G., & Walker, P. (2005). Project Risk Management Guidelines. Managing Risk in Large Projects and Complex Procurements. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

City Of Tampa - Department of Technology and Innovation. (n.d.). City Of Tampa Project Management Guidebook: City Of Tampa - Department of Technology and Innovation. 32.p.

Department of Defense. (2006). Risk Management Guide for DOD Acquisition (6th ed.). U.S.: Defense Technical Information Center.40 p.

Department of Transportation. (2017). Risk Management Guideline. New Jersey: Department of Transportation.Retrieved from http://www.state.nj.us/transportation/capital/pd/documents/RiskManagementGuideline.pdf

European Commission. (2004). Project Cycle Management Guidelines. Brussels: European Commission. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sites/devco/files/methodology-aid-delivery-methods-project-cycle-management-200403_en_2.pdf

International Labour Organization. (2015). Development Cooperation Manual. Public version. Geneva: ILO. Retrieved from http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---exrel/documents/publication/wcms_452076.pdf

Kerzner, H. (2009). Project Management. A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling (10th ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Larson, E., & Gray, C. (2011). Project Management. The Managerial Process (5th ed.). New York: The McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

Method123 empowering managers to succeed. (2003). Project Management Guidebook. Method123. Retrieved from http://www.method123.com/affiliates/method123-ebook.pdf

Missouri Information Technology Advisory Board. (2003). Risk Management: Guidelines and Best Practices. Missouri Information Technology Advisory Board.

ND Enterprise Project Management Advisory Group. (2009). North Dakota Project Management Guidebook. Risk Management Supplement. ND Enterprise Project Management Advisory Group. Retrieved from https://www.nd.gov/itd/sites/itd/files/legacy/services/pm/risk-management-guidebook.pdf

Ohara, S. (2005). Guidebook of Project & Program Management for Enterprise Innovation. Volume II. Project Management Professionals Certification Center. Retrieved from https://articulospm.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/p2mguidebookvolume1_060112.pdf

PM4NGOs. (2013). A Guide to the PMD Pro. PM4NGOs. Retrieved from http://www.pm4ngos.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/PMD_Pro_Guide_2e_EN_USLetter.pdf

Program Management Office (PMO). (2002). Risk Management Guidelines. Georgia: Georgia Technology. Retrieved from http://www.google.lv/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKEwjR7ojh_fLYAhVUFMAKHd9UBLsQFggmMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fgta.georgia.gov%2Fsites%2Fgta.georgia.gov%2Ffiles%2Fimported%2Fvgn%2Fimages%2Fportal%2Fcit_1210%2F3%2F50%2F65747052GTA-PMO-GLI-202%2520Risk%2520Management%2520Guideline.doc&usg=AOvVaw27ZGr-7R9bNx8rWCSfY8yb

Official PM Book for AAPM (2014). International Project Management Commission & The American Academy of Project Management (IPMC & AAPM). (n.d.). AAPM IPMC Project Management Handbook for Managers & Executives. Retrieved from http://certifiedprojectmanager.us/AAPM-Book-Study-Guide-2014.pdf

Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe. (2010). Project Management in the OSCE. Vienna: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe, OSCE Secretariat. Retrieved from http://www.osce.org/secretariat/70693?download=true

U.S. Department of Energy. (2004). Project Control Handbook. U.S: Department of Energy. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/haroldtaylor1113/project-control-handbook

U.S. Department of Justice. (2015). Information Technology (IT) Project Manager Guide. US: Department of Justice. Retrieved from https://www.justice.gov/jmd/file/705781/download

U.S. Department of Transportation. (2016). Project and Construction Management Guidelines. US: Department of Transportation. Retrieved from https://www.transit.dot.gov/sites/fta.dot.gov/files/docs/FTA_Project_and_Construction_Mgmt_Guidelines_2016.pdf

U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO). (2015). Schedule Assessment Guide. Best Practises for Project Schedules. US: Government Accountability Office (GAO). Retrieved from https://www.gao.gov/assets/680/674404.pdf

Uzulāns, J. (2017). The Epistemological Analysis of the Concept “Risk” and Project Risk Management. Riga: University of Latvia. Retrieved from http://pmworldjournal.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/pmwj63-Oct2017-Uzulans-epistemological-analysis-of-risk-second-edition.pdf

The American Institute of Architects. (2007). Integrated Project Delivery: A Guide. Retrieved from https://info.aia.org/SiteObjects/files/IPD_Guide_2007.pdf

Transportation Research Board. (2010). Guidebook on Risk Analysis Tools and Management Practices to Control Transportation Project Costs. Washington: Transportation Research Board. Retrieved from http://www.trb.org/Publications/Blurbs/163722.aspx

Downloads

Published

01.02.2018

How to Cite

Uzulāns, J. (2018). Ontological Analysis of the Project Risk Management Concept ‘Risk’. Economics and Business, 32, 21-35. https://doi.org/10.1515/eb-2018-0002