Scientific Knowledge and Technology Transfer Policy in the EU

Auste Kiskiene

Abstract


The article focuses on identifying possibilities to facilitate scientific knowledge and technology transfer and commercialization by means of public policy. Theoretical rationale for technology transfer public policy is analysed, specifically – market failure, system failure and authors’ suggested cultural failure approaches are discussed. Based on the theoretical approaches, the EU public policy and the example of Lithuanian public policy in the field of technology transfer is analysed. Recommendations for adopting ecosystem approach towards fostering technology transfer are presented.

Keywords:

Innovation policy, knowledge and technology transfer, knowledge and innovation based economy, technology transfer policy.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Rogers, E. M., Takegami, S., Yin, J., “Lessons Learned About Technology Transfer,” in Systems and Policies for the Global Learning Economy. Edited by David V. Gibson, Chandler Stolp, Pedro Conceição, and Manuel V. Heitor, International Series on Technology Policy and Innovation, Praeger: Westport (Connecticut), London, 2003, pp. 369–382.

Gustafsson, R., Autio F., “Grounding for innovation policy: the market, system and social-cognitive failure rationales,” in The Future of Science, Technology and Innovation Policy: Linking Research and Practice, Conference papers, University of Sussex, Sep. 11–13, 2006.

Rasmussen, E., Moen, Ø. Gulbrandsen, M., “Initiatives to promote commercialization of university knowledge,” in Technovation, vol. 26, 2006, pp. 518–533.

Breschi. St., “Spatial patterns of innovation: evidence from patent data,” in The Organization of Economic Innovation in Europe. Edited by Alfonso Gambardella and Franco Malerba, Cambridge University Press, 1999, pp. 71–102.

Fiedler, H., “Technology Transfer – A Tool to Promote Innovation and Cooperation between Science and Industry,” in Utilizing Technology Transfer to Develop Small and Medium Enterprises. Edited by Eugenia Bulumac and Richard A. Bendis. IOS Press, 2001, p. 119–128.

Berkhout, A. J., Hartmann, D., Van Der Duin, P., Ortt, R., “Innovating the innovation process,” in International Journal of Technology Management, vol. 34, no. 3/4, 2006, pp. 390–404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2006.009466

European Commission. Innovation Union Scoreboard 2013. European Union, 2013.

Leydesdorff, L., Etzkowitz, H., “A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations,” in Universities and the Global Knowledge Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Edited by Henry Etzkowitz and Loet Leydesdorff. Printer: London, Washington, 1997, pp. 155–162.

Sharif, N., “Emergence and development of the National Innovation Systems concept,” in Research Policy, vol. 35, no. 5, June 2006, pp. 745–766. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.001

Etzkowitz, H., Webster, A., “Entrepreneurial Science: The Second Academic Revolution,” in Capitalizing Knowledge: New Intersections of Industry and Academia. Edited by Henry Etzkowitz, Andrew Webster, and Peter Healey. State University of New York Press, 1998, pp. 21–46.

Bozeman, B., “Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory,” in Research Policy, vol. 29, no. 4–5, Apr. 2000, pp. 627–655. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00093-1

Hauknes, J., Norgren, L., Economic rationales of government involvement in innovation and the supply of innovation-related services. The STEP Report Series. Stiftelsen STEP, 1999.

Stephen, M., Scott, J. T., “The nature of innovation market failure and the design of public support for private innovation,” in Research Policy, vol. 29, no. 4–5, Apr. 2000, pp. 437–447.

Malerba, F., “Public Policy and Industrial Dynamics: An Evolutionary Perspective,” Targeted Socio-Economic Research (TSER) program of the European Commission (DGXII) under the Fourth Framework Program, System of Innovation Research Program, Sub-Project 3.1.1.: System Theories of Innovation: Policy Implication, Linköping University (Sweden), 1998.

Scotchmer, S., “Innovation and Incentives,” The MIT Press: Cambridge, Massachusetts, London (England), 2004.

European Commission, “Giving More for Research in Europe: The role of foundations and the non-profit sector in boosting R&D investment,” Report by an Expert Group on Measures and actions to promote the role of foundations and the non-profit sector in boosting R&D investment, September 2005.

Ebner, A., “The Institutional Analysis of Entrepreneurship: Historist Aspects of Schumpeters Development Theory,” in Joseph Alois Schumpeter: Entrepreneurship, Style and Vision. Edited by Jurgen G. Backhaus. Secaucus, NJ, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003, pp. 117–139.

Ahmad. N., Hoffmann. A. N., “A Framework for Addressing and Measuring Entrepreneurship”. OECD Statistics Working Paper, STD/DOC (2008) 2, Jan. 2008.

Putnam, R. D., “Foreword,” in Role of Social Capital in Development: An Empirical Assessment. Edited by Christiaan Grootaert and Thierry van Bastelaer. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. xxi–xxii.

European Commission, “Europe 2020,” [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/index_en.htm. [Accessed: Oct. 1, 2013].

European Commission, “Innovation Union. A Europe 2020 Initiative,” [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/index_en.cfm. [Accessed: Oct. 1, 2013].

European Commission. “Other studies and research on innovation”. [Online]. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/index_en.cfm?pg=other-studies. [Accessed: Oct. 1, 2013].

European Commission, “Improving knowledge transfer between research institutions and industry across Europe: embracing open innovation,” Voluntary guidelines for universities and other research institutions to improve their links with industry across Europe. COM(2007) 182 final. Brussels, 4.4.2007.

European Council, “The conclusions of the European Council,” (Feb. 4, 2011). EUCO 2/1/11, REV 1. Brussels, Mar. 8, 2011.

European Commission, Giving in evidence, “Fundraising from philanthropy in European universities,” Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2011.

European Commission, “EUROSTAT,” Science, technology and innovation statistics, [Online]. Available: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/ portal/page/portal/science_technology_innovation/data/main_tables. [Accessed: Oct. 2, 2013].

Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Lithuania, “Integrated Science, Studies and Business centres,” (Valleys), [Online]. Available: http://www.smm.lt/web/en/science1/science_1. [Accessed: Oct. 1, 2013].

“Business Angels Fund I,” [Online]. Available: http://www.mesinvest.lt/ index.php/business-angels-fund-i/82. [Accessed: Oct. 1, 2013].

Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Lithuania, “Commercialization of R&D results,” (orig. MTEP rezultatų komercinimas). [Online]. Available: http://www.smm.lt/web/lt/mokslas/ mokslo_ir_verslo_bendradarbiavimas/mtep_rezult. [Accessed: Oct. 2, 2013].

“Agency for Science, Innovation and Technology,” [Online]. Available: http://www.mita.lt/en/istaigos-informacija/about-mita/. [Accessed: Oct. 2, 2013].




DOI: 10.7250/eb.2014.018

Cited-By

1. A New Systematic Approach to Vulnerability Assessment of Innovation Capability of Construction Enterprises
Jingxiao Zhang, Haiyan Xie, Klaus Schmidt, Hui Li
Sustainability  vol: 8  issue: 1  first page: 17  year: 2015  
doi: 10.3390/su8010017

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c)